| #1 |
There are several reasons, depending on your values and priorities. Ethanol cars combine economy, environmental commitment, and tried-and-tested technology. We are already seeing that more and more private individuals, companies, and public organizations have genuinely decided to lower their carbon-dioxide emissions and contribute to a road-vehicle sector that is more sustainable in the long term.
| #2 |
The most important reason for driving on bioethanol is that you greatly reduce emissions of fossil carbon dioxide, which is a threat to the earth's climate system. The so-called greenhouse effect or the threat of undesirable climate change is currently considered one of the biggest threats to life on earth.
| #3 |
Reducing our unilateral dependence on oil from a small number of net-exporting oil countries is one of the main reasons why, with the aid of legislation and various benefits, both the USA and the EU are trying to dramatically increase use of biofuels, especially in the transport sector. The transport sector already uses about 70% of all oil consumed in the USA and the EU – a proportion that is still on the increase.
| #4 |
Fuel cells and hybrids are good examples of technology that makes vehicles more energy-efficient. But these energy-efficient engines also need energy and an increasing proportion of that energy also has to be renewable. Ethanol can easily replace petrol/diesel in hybrid engines. Ethanol is also an excellent carrier of hydrogen; by introducing ethanol through flexifuel cars, such as FlexiFuel and BioPower, we can speed up the development of a network of ethanol filling stations. We will thus also speed up the introduction of energy-efficient fuel cell-powered cars with hydrogen from renewable resources – something all vehicle manufacturers see as a necessity in the long term.
| #5 |
Other emissions that are injurious to health, such as nitrogen oxides, particles, and hydrocarbons, are also lowered when you run a car on bioethanol. Modern petrol cars, however, are already so clean that these improvements are of marginal importance although, compared with diesel cars, the improvements are manifest. The only measurable emission that increases with alcohols is aldehydes. With current catalysers, however, the level is so low that this is not deemed significant.
| #6 |
Sweden is one of Europe's leaders as far as bioethanol is concerned. Some countries will be adopting a leading industrial and environmental position in the development of complete systems of renewable fuels. The vehicle manufacturers assess that a strong presence on the Swedish market in this area is of particular interest, as environmental awareness is very high and there are long-term political and industrial intentions to develop Sweden into a leading industrial country and an international environmental model in this particular field.
| #7 |
With petrol operation, the fuel consumption is exactly the same as for a traditional petrol car. With ethanol operation, the fuel consumption per km is higher because ethanol contains less energy than petrol. E85's energy content is about 70% that of petrol, and bioethanol's lower retail price compensates for the increased fuel consumption of about 20-35%.
| #8 |
Yes, the benefit value is reduced by 20% in terms of reduced net tax; a tax discount equivalent to choosing a car costing about SEK 50,000 less. The very low benefit value also means 20% lower social insurance costs for companies.
| #9 |
Free parking is available for environmentally friendly cars in a large number of municipalities, and this will be spreading to even more municipalities and towns.
| #10 |
No, they have one tank for petrol and E85 fuel. The two fuels can be mixed in any way. A computer detects the current fuel mix and adapts the engine accordingly. When changing fuel, the engine needs a little 'thinking time' to detect the current fuel mix before adjusting the setting.
| #11 |
No, the engine is adapted for use with any combination of ethanol and petrol.
| #12 |
In the winter, the built-in engine heater should be used at temperatures below +5 ºC if the tank contains E85 alone. A higher proportion of petrol improves the cold-start properties, but it is a good idea to use the engine heater at temperatures below +10 ºC so as to radically reduce emissions when driving with a cold engine. This applies to all cars – both petrol and diesel.
| #13 |
Since winter 2006-07, a winter grade of ethanol is being introduced during the months Nov-March (75% ethanol plus 25% petrol). The result for motorists will be more reliable cold starting, and you won't need to worry about trips into the mountains.
To guarantee starting at temperatures below -15ºC, current ethanol cars require an engine heater or a higher proportion of petrol in the fuel.
| #14 |
Running the engine on bioethanol E85 leads to better performance than using petrol. The engine power of Saab cars increases by about 20%, i.e., about 30 PS, as ethanol has a higher-octane count. In Ford and Volvo cars, the power increases by several percent.
| #15 |
No, energy consumption is the same when running either engine on E85 or petrol.
| #16 |
Bioethanol has a lower energy content than petrol. This means that cars running on E85 fuel have an approximately 20-35% higher consumption than when running on petrol alone. The lower price of E85 compensates for this.
| #17 |
No, the percentage increase remains the same, but the difference increases in absolute terms.
| #18 |
Only 15% (proportion of petrol in the mix) of the price of E85 is affected by the major price variations for raw oil. It has been relatively stable for several years. It is the petrol companies who set the end price at the E85 pump.
| #19 |
E85 pumps are currently well disseminated all over Sweden. There are at present 1400 filling stations. On the oil companies websites you can find information about where you can fill up on E85.
| #20 |
The Technical Research Institute of Sweden recently investigated the risks of fire and explosion associated with E85. The risks proved to be significantly smaller than what was believed earlier and the conclusion is that E85 isn't more flammable than petrol.
| #21 |
Bioethanol is a bioalcohol produced from natural resources such as sugar cane, grain, or maize.
| #22 |
In the long term, sugar cane will be the predominant raw material in the tropical countries, and the temperate climate zones will increasingly be shifting to manufacture of ethanol from raw materials rich in cellulose.
| #23 |
Forestry cellulose primarily comes from residual products such as branches and treetops, wood produced by thinning, etc. From cultivated agricultural areas we will collect cellulose from surplus material such as stalks and leaves and surplus agricultural areas, which will also be usable as energy-producing forest instead of becoming overgrown and thus destroying valuable land for future cultivation. Household waste contains large amounts of cellulose – a raw material for bioethanol that will be of increasing interest.
| #24 |
Brazil, which is currently the world's largest ethanol producer and which has been producing ethanol the longest, produces ethanol for about SEK 2 per litre, compared with petrol and diesel, which at the current raw oil price are produced for about SEK 2 per litre. In Europe and the USA, bioethanol is currently produced from maize and grain for SEK 3-5 per litre.
| #25 |
Experts and authorities in the EU and the USA are reckoning on producing ethanol from cellulose-rich raw materials for SEK 2-4 per litre, depending on technological developments, future costs of raw materials, and effects of scale as a result of volume developments. In the event of a breakthrough for cellulose technology, a further reduction in the cost of producing ethanol from sugar cane is also anticipated.
| #26 |
With regard to the effect on the climate, the carbon dioxide's provenance is a crucial factor, i.e., whether it comes from 'dead' or 'living' carbon. Both of the latter are stored solar energy, but the 'dead' carbon (oil, coal, and natural gas) has been locked in (fossil-fixed) under the earth's crust for 200 million years. Its release into the atmosphere results in an imbalance that affects climate. We get biofuels such as ethanol and biogas from the 'living' carbon that comes from the plants surrounding us today and that forms part of the carbon cycle, i.e., nature's way of moving carbon around to facilitate life on earth. Photosynthesis in plants breaks the carbon dioxide down into carbohydrates, which build up the plants, and oxygen, which is emitted into the air. When the plant dies or is burnt, the carbon returns into the air and is then absorbed by other plants.
The 'dead' carbon in the form of oil (petrol and diesel), carbon, or natural gas comes from plants that existed millions of years ago. The carbon they absorbed is now released when these fossil fuels are used. There are no extra plants that can absorb this carbon. This means a raised carbon dioxide content in the atmosphere and an increased greenhouse effect.
Brazil – now the world's biggest ethanol producer – produces ethanol with a 90-95% net saving of fossil carbon dioxide. A report from Chalmers University of Technology (Magnus Blinge) shows that current ethanol production in Örnsköldsvik uses 2% fossil energy, which means a 98% net reduction in fossil carbon dioxide.
| #27 |
E85 consists of 85% ethanol and 15% 95-octane lead-free petrol.
| #28 |
If we assume E85 consumption of 0.1 litres per km, this means about 40 g fossil C02/km. This figure includes the petrol component plus manufacture and distribution of E85.
| #29 |
No, it isn't. In the 50s and 60s, there were production plants in the USA with a really poor energy exchange. Such plants no longer exist. Some people assert that you have to put more energy into the ethanol than you get out of it. That's not the way it works. Ethanol is currently produced on commercial terms. There are no subsidies. For example, if you sell ethanol at SEK 5/litre, then that amount must cover costs for raw materials and energy, capital costs, any profit, etc. So everyone understands that very little energy must be put into the process and that it has to be as cheap as possible.
In future large-scale ethanol production from cellulose, Swedish researchers are reckoning on energy efficiency of 75% to 85%. This is because ethanol is just one of several products obtained from cellulose as a raw material. Lignin is another product used in thermal power stations. The manufacturing process can be compared with an oil refinery: raw oil goes in and many different products come out. The same thing happens with the cellulose process: forestry raw materials go in and a number of different products come out.
| #30 |
We will be doing both. We have and have had an annual surplus of forestry raw materials in Sweden for many years. With the aid of current knowledge from the results of research and future knowledge from the research that is constantly in progress, we can increase the amount of forestry raw materials by about 30% p.a. over the coming years. This will give us an opportunity to manufacture a large volume of renewable fuels in Sweden.
| #31 |
In Sweden, there is already 5% E85 in all 95-octane petrol, and this is an effective way of quickly getting large amounts of bioethanol onto the market. Together with other incentives, this in turn means that more people are having the courage to invest in ethanol production. The disadvantage is that using low blends do not promote the development of the technology. If the target is to achieve 100% renewable fuel, then there must be parallel development whereby we invest in solutions to achievement of the 100% target.
| #32 |
Probably not. We need to do many things at the same time, e.g., invest more in expansion of public transport and build smarter societies as far as traffic is concerned. But the most important thing is that we have to produce far more energy-efficient vehicles. In future, we have to have vehicles that will not consume over 0.03 litres/km, e.g., plug-in hybrids largely powered by electricity.
| #33 |
Current petrol cars with catalysers are already very clean, but flexifuel cars run on ethanol further reduce other emissions and have good margins regarding the requirements for EU 2005.
| #34 |
In Brazil, most car manufacturers offer flexifuel cars, and in the USA Ford, GM and Chrysler have sold about 4 million flexifuel cars. Ford was the first to launch flexifuel technology in Europe. Recently, a large number of car manufacturers have been bringing out flexifuel models in Sweden.
| #35 |
In Sweden, we only need 20% of the cultivatable land to meet our food needs. The rest can be used to grow energy crops, which can in turn be converted into fuel. From a global perspective, it is quite correct that we must first satisfy people's food requirements. But it is not first and foremost a lack of food that is causing famine, it's poverty. Ethanol production in developing countries can be a tremendous chance for farmers to get more money for their crops. The technology of extracting ethanol from cellulose reduces competition with food, as we can to a much greater extent use forestry raw materials and residual products from agriculture and other areas to make ethanol.
| #36 |
In Brazil ethanol is made from sugar cane. The threat to the rainforest is very worrying, but it has nothing to do with cultivation of sugar cane. Brazil is a very big country – it takes five hours to fly from North to South. Cultivation of sugar cane takes place several thousand kilometres from the rainforest. Reports confirming this are available from Sweden's National Environmental Protection Board and the organisation for green motoring Gröna Bilister.
To meet environmental requirements and guarantee the quality of bioethanol, prominent Swedish, European, and Brazilian researchers in collaboration with the Brazilian government and the International Energy Agency and at the initiative of BAFF have set up specifications of requirements, criteria, and regulations regarding ethanol production. Read more about that at www.sustainableethanolinitiative.com.
| #37 |
It is a good thing that this question is raised, since the work of the sugar cane field workers often is carried out during tough conditions. It's an important question and a solution must be found that doesn't create other social problems.
In Brazil about 6 million people get their income thanks to the bioalcohol programme. According to Brazilian researchers, most of these would otherwise have moved to the slum of the big cities without income, or they had been burning rain forest to grow food for the days need. Because of this, the Brazilian government is introducing mechanisation gradually as new field areals are taken into use. The Brazilian sugarcane industry is today where the Swedish forest companies were a generation ago, when they were mechanising the forestry work to get rid of the heavy jobs. Good for the workers, yes, but it has to be done gradually to avoid creating massive unemployment.